European Urban and Regional Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bontje, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2, 135-151 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0969776403010002003

A `Planner's Paradise' Lost?

Past, Present and Future of Dutch National Urbanization Policy

Marco Bontje

University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

National as well as international observers have praised the Dutch national urbanization policy as being exceptionally successful in the recent past. Looking at the urbanization process of recent decades, however, one could wonder if this praise was well deserved. It is acknowledged that national or regional plans are generally only the start of a long-term planning process in which many other actors are involved. Therefore, there is generally no direct connection between these plans and the eventual outcomes. However, if the eventual local outcomes are in conflict with the initial goals of the national or regional plans, the effectiveness of the process between plan acceptance and application in practice becomes very doubtful. The empirical analysis presented in this article suggests that the actual Dutch urbanization process since the 1960s was far from what the national planners wanted it to be. Some successes were surely reached, most of all with the policy of growth centres, but the general tendency of unplanned suburbanization remained unbroken despite all planning efforts. Explanations for this lack of success are probably partly due to administrative or political problems, but much more to the generally limited possibilities for influencing or counteracting the effects of economic, technological and socio-demographic processes through physical planning policy.

Key Words: national urbanization policy • planning success and failure • Netherlands


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?