This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cumbers, A. Articles by McMaster, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Institutions, Power and Space

Assessing the Limits to Institutionalism in Economic Geography

University of Glasgow, UK, acumbers{at}geog.gla.ac.uk

Danny MacKinnon

University of Aberdeen, UK

Robert McMaster

University of Aberdeen, UK

Economic geographers have drawn upon concepts from institutional economics and economic sociology in recent years to understand processes of regional development within an increasingly globalized economy. In this paper, we assess the influence of this institutional `turn' in economic geography and regional development studies. Two interrelated themes provide the focus of our critique. First, we emphasize the neglect of power and politics in relation to potential intraregional tensions and divisions and the effects of wider processes of uneven development and political-economic regulation. Second, we are critical of the tendency to reify the region over other geographical scales as an object of empirical enquiry and a site of policy intervention. In response to these shortcomings, we conclude by emphasizing the need to rediscover `a sense of political economy' (Martin and Sunley, 2001), suggesting that the potential of institutional approaches can best be realized by linking these to a reworked spatial political economy. While this will inevitably run up against conceptual and methodological difficulties given the differing origins and orientations of the two bodies of knowledge, such a theoretical synthesis could combine a sensitivity to difference, context and contingency with a stronger appreciation of the realities of uneven development and contested social relations under advanced global capitalism.

Key Words: institutions • power • regions • scale • uneven development

European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol. 10, No. 4, 325-342 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/09697764030104003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. S. Rafiqui Evolving economic landscapes: why new institutional economics matters for economic geography J. Econ. Geogr., May 1, 2009; 9(3): 329 - 353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Andrews An Institutionalist Approach to Spatial Variations in Public Service Failure: Evidence From England European Urban and Regional Studies, October 1, 2008; 15(4): 349 - 362. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Y.-R. Yang and H.-K. Wang Dilemmas of Local Governance under the Development Zone Fever in China: A Case Study of the Suzhou Region Urban Stud, May 1, 2008; 45(5-6): 1037 - 1054. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Harrison On the Edge of Reason: Planning and Urban Futures in Africa Urban Stud, February 1, 2006; 43(2): 319 - 335. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. R. A. Clark The 'New Associationalism' in agriculture: agro-food diversification and multifunctional production logics J. Econ. Geogr., August 1, 2005; 5(4): 475 - 498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Bristow Everyone's a 'winner': problematising the discourse of regional competitiveness J. Econ. Geogr., June 1, 2005; 5(3): 285 - 304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Moulaert and J. Nussbaumer The Social Region: Beyond the Territorial Dynamics of the Learning Economy European Urban and Regional Studies, January 1, 2005; 12(1): 45 - 64. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Paasi Place and region: looking through the prism of scale Progress in Human Geography, August 1, 2004; 28(4): 536 - 546. [PDF]