Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
European Urban and Regional Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Domanski, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

West and East in ‘New Europe’: The Pitfalls of Paternalism and a Claimant Attitude

Boleslaw Domanski

Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland, b.domanski{at}geo.uj.edu.pl

The author discusses dangers which stem from the old West-East divide of Europe. On the one hand, there may be a deterministic interpretation of Central and Eastern Europe as political, economic and cultural periphery, which leads to paternalistic attitudes and belief in one-way transfers of knowledge and decisions. This may legitimize unequal treatment and exclusionary political action on the part of Western Europe. On the other hand, the people of Central and Eastern Europe may tend to adopt what can be termed a ‘claimant’ attitude towards the West. The ideology of ‘catching-up’ and a sense of having being wronged in the past reinforce acceptance of the role of recipients of external influences and of wealth generated in the West, as well as the image of the European Union as a bureaucratic institution, to which claims are directed. This may entail passive behaviour on the part of Central and Eastern European societies and lack of solidarity with ‘the outsiders’ remaining outside the new EU boundaries. Together these can lead us to discard the idea of European solidarity, coherence and trust. Instead, there is a need to recognize the capacity for action and foster social mobilization in Central and Eastern Europe, so that its peoples can contribute their values and activities to Europe as a whole.

Key Words: Central and Eastern Europe • core and periphery • European integration • Western Europe

European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol. 11, No. 4, 377-381 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0969776404046272


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
K. Horschelmann and A. Stenning
Ethnographies of postsocialist change
Progress in Human Geography, June 1, 2008; 32(3): 339 - 361.
[Abstract] [PDF]