Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
European Urban and Regional Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bondonio, D.
Right arrow Articles by Greenbaum, R. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Do Business Investment Incentives Promote Employment in Declining Areas? Evidence from EU Objective-2 Regions

Daniele Bondonio

Università del Piemonte Orientale, Italy

Robert T. Greenbaum

The Ohio State University, USA

To help address the large regional disparities in income that stubbornly persist across Europe, billions of euros have been invested in business investment incentives cofunded through the European Regional Development Fund. Since 1989, these incentives have been spatially targeted through various Structural Funds aimed at promoting economic and social cohesion among all European Union countries. ‘Objective 2’ of the Structural Funds aims to help revitalize those areas with persistently high unemployment and declining industrial production. Despite the continued popularity of these initiatives, no reliable ex-post empirical evidence of their impact is yet available to help EU policymakers refine future geographicallytargeted economic development policies. To begin to address the void, this article uses unique firm-specific data available for northern and central Italy to estimate a parametric difference in difference model that calculates the employment impact of the ‘Objective 2’ area business incentives net of all changes due to economic trends that are exogenous to the programme intervention. Mean impact results show that the incentives did promote positive employment growth in the target areas that would not have otherwise occurred. The analysis further finds that the incentives were most effective when targeting production in province–industry pairs that had the least severe declines during the years prior to the programme intervention.

Key Words: employment policy • impact evaluation • structural funds • urban and regional economic development

European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol. 13, No. 3, 225-244 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0969776406065432
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?