Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
European Urban and Regional Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, G.
Right arrow Articles by Baumann, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Bringing Putnam to the European Regions

On the Relevance of Social Capital for Economic Growth

Gerald Schneider

University of Konstanz, Germany, gerald.schneider{at}uni-konstanz.de

Thomas Plümper

University of Konstanz, Germany

Steffen Baumann

University of Konstanz, Germany

One of the most influential contributions to the study of political culture of the 1990s was Robert D. Putnam’s book on the positive impact that interpersonal trust supposedly has on economic welfare and the effectiveness of political institutions in Italy. Making Democracy Work showed in bivariate correlations that progress depends largely on the social capital manifest in the Italian regions. We evaluate this hypothesis in a wider sample of regions by analysing quantitatively the role that political culture has on economic growth in the regions of the European Union (EU). We first develop a neoclassical growth model and incorporate political culture variables into this framework. Our cross-sectional regression results cast some doubts on the generalizability of Putnam’s bold claims. The analysis particularly shows, in accordance with standard models of economic growth, that economic rather than cultural factors are the most forceful determinants of growth in the European regions. Only one dimension of political culture, the intensity of social communication, has the expected positive impact.

European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol. 7, No. 4, 307-317 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/096977640000700402


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
European Urban and Regional StudiesHome page
M. Freitag and A. Vatter
Political Institutions and the Wealth of Regions: Swiss Cantons in Comparative Perspective
European Urban and Regional Studies, October 1, 2004; 11(4): 291 - 301.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Regional Science ReviewHome page
H. W. Armstrong and R. Read
Microstates And Subnational Regions: Mutual Industrial Policy Lessons
International Regional Science Review, January 1, 2003; 26(1): 117 - 141.
[Abstract] [PDF]