This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Brenner, N. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Metropolitan Institutional Reform and the Rescaling of State Space in Contemporary Western Europe

New York University, USA, neil.brenner{at}nyu.edu

Throughout western Europe, metropolitan governance is back on the agenda. Since the early 1990s, new forms of city-suburban cooperation, regional coordination, regionwide spatial planning and metropolitan institutional organization have been promoted in major city-regions. In contrast to the forms of metropolitan governance that prevailed during the Fordist-Keynesian period - which emphasized administrative modernization, interterritorial equalization and the efficient delivery of public services - the newest wave of metropolitan governance reform is focused upon economic priorities such as territorial competitiveness and attracting external capital investment in the context of geoeconomic and European integration. This article develops an interpretation of the new metropolitan governance in western Europe in two steps. First, I situate the new metropolitan governance in historical context by underscoring its qualitative differences from earlier waves of metropolitan institutional reform. Second, building upon a critique of contemporary `new regionalist' discourses, I develop an interpretation of current metropolitan reform initiatives as important structural and strategic expressions of ongoing, crisis-induced transformations of state spatiality. To this end, I relate contemporary metropolitan reform projects: (a) to various broader trends and counter-trends of state spatial reorganization; and (b) to newly emergent political strategies oriented towards a reconfiguration of inherited approaches to entrepreneurial urban governance. From this perspective, contemporary forms of metropolitan institutional reform are interpreted as key expressions of ongoing processes of state rescaling through which territorial competitiveness is being promoted at a regional scale, albeit in highly contradictory, often self-undermining ways. The article concludes by summarizing some of the methodological implications of this analysis for future studies of urban-regional restructuring and the production of new state spaces.

Key Words: metropolitan governance • new regionalism • path dependency • state rescaling • urban entrepreneurialism • western Europe

European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol. 10, No. 4, 297-324 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/09697764030104002


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Rodriguez-Pose and R. Ezcurra Does decentralization matter for regional disparities? A cross-country analysis J. Econ. Geogr., September 23, 2009; (2009) lbp049v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. L. Prytherch New Euroregional Territories, Old Catalanist Dreams?: Articulating Culture, Economy and Territory In the Mediterranean Arc European Urban and Regional Studies, April 1, 2009; 16(2): 131 - 145. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. M. Johnson Cross-Border Regions and Territorial Restructuring in Central Europe: Room for More transboundary Space European Urban and Regional Studies, April 1, 2009; 16(2): 177 - 191. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Pearce and S. Ayres Governance in the English Regions: The Role of the Regional Development Agencies Urban Stud, March 1, 2009; 46(3): 537 - 557. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Jiang Xu and A. Yeh Decoding Urban Land Governance: State Reconstruction in Contemporary Chinese Cities Urban Stud, March 1, 2009; 46(3): 559 - 581. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Lobao, R. Martin, and A. Rodriguez-Pose Editorial: Rescaling the state: new modes of institutional-territorial organization Cambridge J Regions Econ Soc, March 1, 2009; 2(1): 3 - 12. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Curtis How Can We Address Health Inequality Through Healthy Public Policy in Europe? European Urban and Regional Studies, October 1, 2008; 15(4): 293 - 305. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Eraydin, B. Armatli Koroglu, H. Erkus Ozturk, and S. Senem Yasar Network Governance for Competitiveness: The Role of Policy Networks in the Economic Performance of Settlements in the Izmir Region Urban Stud, October 1, 2008; 45(11): 2291 - 2321. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Pikner Reorganizing Cross-Border Governance Capacity: The Case of the Helsinki--Tallinn Euregio European Urban and Regional Studies, July 1, 2008; 15(3): 211 - 227. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Young and S. Kaczmarek The Socialist Past and Postsocialist Urban Identity in Central and Eastern Europe: The Case of Lodz, Poland European Urban and Regional Studies, January 1, 2008; 15(1): 53 - 70. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Helms, R. Atkinson, and G. MacLeod Editorial: Securing the City: Urban Renaissance, Policing and Social Regulation European Urban and Regional Studies, October 1, 2007; 14(4): 267 - 276. [PDF]

				l. Deas and A. Lord From a New Regionalism to an Unusual Regionalism? The Emergence of Non-standard Regional Spaces and Lessons for the Territorial Reorganisation of the State Urban Stud, September 1, 2006; 43(10): 1847 - 1877. [Abstract] [PDF]