This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Maskell, P. Articles by Malmberg, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Competitiveness of Firms and Regions

‘Ubiquitification’ and the Importance of Localized Learning

Copenhagen Business School, Denmark

Anders Malmberg

Uppsala University, Sweden

In traditional location theory there is a distinction between factors of production for which the costs differ significantly between locations, on the one hand, and production inputs which are in practice available everywhere at more or less the same cost (i.e. so-called ubiquities) on the other.

In this article, we discuss the process whereby some previously important location factors are actively converted into ubiquities. With an admittedly rather horrendous term, we label this process ‘ubi-quitification’. It is argued that ubiquitification is the outcome of the ongoing globalization process as well as of a process whereby former tacit knowledge gradually becomes codified.

Ubiquitification tends to undermine the competitiveness of firms in the high-cost areas of the world. When international markets are opened up and when knowledge of the latest production technologies and organizational designs become globally available, firms in low-cost areas become more competitive. In a knowledge-based economy, as a consequence, firms in high-cost areas must either shield some valuable pieces of knowledge from becoming globally accessible, or be able to create, acquire, accumulate and utilize codifiable knowledge a little faster than their cost-wise more favourably located competitors.

Focusing on learning processes, the article maintains that most firms learn from close interaction with suppliers, customers and rivals. Furthermore, processes of knowledge creation are strongly influenced by specific localized capabilities such as resources, institutions, social and cultural structures.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Ettlinger The predicament of firms in the new and old economies: a critical inquiry into traditional binaries in the study of the space-economy Progress in Human Geography, February 1, 2008; 32(1): 45 - 69. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. H. Hansen The far side of international business: local initiatives in the global workshop J. Econ. Geogr., January 1, 2008; 8(1): 1 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Bathelt Geographies of production: growth regimes in spatial perspective 3 - toward a relational view of economic action and policy Progress in Human Geography, April 1, 2006; 30(2): 223 - 236. [PDF]

				M. Lorenzen Editorial: Why do Clusters Change? European Urban and Regional Studies, July 1, 2005; 12(3): 203 - 208. [PDF]

				H. Bathelt Geographies of production: growth regimes in spatial perspective (II) - knowledge creation and growth in clusters Progress in Human Geography, April 1, 2005; 29(2): 204 - 216. [PDF]

				A. Cumbers and D. MacKinnon Introduction: Clusters in Urban and Regional Development Urban Stud, May 1, 2004; 41(5-6): 959 - 969. [PDF]

				F. Todtling and M. Trippl Like Phoenix from the Ashes? The Renewal of Clusters in Old Industrial Areas Urban Stud, May 1, 2004; 41(5-6): 1175 - 1195. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Vale Innovation and Knowledge Driven by a Focal Corporation: The Case of the Autoeuropa Supply Chain European Urban and Regional Studies, April 1, 2004; 11(2): 124 - 140. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Bathelt, A. Malmberg, and P. Maskell Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation Progress in Human Geography, February 1, 2004; 28(1): 31 - 56. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. M. Williams, V. Balaz, and C. Wallace International Labour Mobility and Uneven Regional Development in Europe: Human Capital, Knowledge and Entrepreneurship European Urban and Regional Studies, January 1, 2004; 11(1): 27 - 46. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Bathelt Geographies of production: growth regimes in spatial perspective 1-innovation, institutions and social systems Progress in Human Geography, December 1, 2003; 27(6): 763 - 778. [PDF]

				H. Lawton Smith Local Innovation Assemblages and Institutional Capacity in Local High-tech Economic Development: The Case of Oxfordshire Urban Stud, June 1, 2003; 40(7): 1353 - 1369. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Oinas and E. J. Malecki The Evolution of Technologies in Time and Space: From National and Regional to Spatial Innovation Systems International Regional Science Review, January 1, 2002; 25(1): 102 - 131. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Santos Innovation and Territory: Which Strategies to Promote Regional Innovation Systems in Portugal? European Urban and Regional Studies, April 1, 2000; 7(2): 147 - 157. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Fuellhart Localization and the Use of Information Sources: The Case of the Carpet Industry European Urban and Regional Studies, January 1, 1999; 6(1): 39 - 58. [Abstract] [PDF]